Mahua admits to giving MP’s log-in password to Hiranandani : Took scarf-lipstick for friendship, Take help in renovation of bungalow

In a cash-for-query controversy involving TMC (Trinamool Congress) Member of Parliament Mahua Moitra, she has given structured responses to all the allegations against her on a TV channel. Moitra confirmed during the interview that she accepted assistance from Himadri Bhattacharya, a friend, for her wardrobe, which included scarves, lipstick, and eyeshadow. She further explained that at one point, she sought Bhattacharya’s help for renovating her bungalow.

During this conversation, Gautam Adani’s name also came up. Moitra claimed that she did not ask questions in Parliament in exchange for monetary offers from BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party) MPs. These allegations arose when she accused a BJP MP of offering her money instead of allowing her to ask questions in Parliament.

  1. I wear a Mangalsutra when Dehradun’s spelling is not known During the hearing of allegations by Supreme Court lawyer Jay Anant Dehadrai, Moitra mentioned, “I fight with Dehadrai while wearing my Mangalsutra. Imagine how hilarious this is.” TMC MP further stated – I was accused. I wear a Mangalsutra. You must know that I am wearing a Mangalsutra. I am a Banker. I have 35 pairs of Mangalsutra. I have been wearing Mangalsutra since then, as he (Jay Dehadrai) does not know how to spell.
  2. Hirananda gave Scarf, Lipstick, and Eyeshadow in exchange Regarding the allegations of accepting a bet in place of asking questions in Parliament from Hirananda, Moitra said that four years ago on my birthday, my close friend gave me a scarf as a gift in exchange. He also bought lipstick and eyeshadow from the brand Bobbi Brown for me.
  3. Hirananda called an architect for the renovation of the bungalow Moitra also denied allegations that Hirananda had given her money for renovating her bungalow. She said – I have denied such allegations that Hirananda gave me money for the renovation of the bungalow. Regarding this, Moitra added that when I had a government bungalow, it was old. I asked Darshan to ask him to come and redesign the door so that something new could be created inside.
  4. Gautam Adani offered money not to ask questions Mahua Moitra had also alleged that Gautam Adani had offered her money not to ask questions. Moitra claimed that Adani had last contacted her three years ago to make a deal with her, sitting with two Lok Sabha MPs, but she refused. The issue is that they were offering money to stop them from asking questions.

Moitra further stated that on October 8, he contacted her again and told her to remain silent for six months. She said: “You can attack me, but don’t mention the Prime Minister’s name.” This information provides context regarding the allegations made by Mahua Moitra and the responses she gave during the interview.

Ethics Committee seeks Mahua Moitra’s travel details in Cash for Query case In the ongoing Cash for Query case, the Ethics Committee has begun its investigation. On October 26, the committee held a nearly three-hour meeting to discuss the matter. The committee has written to the Revenue Department and the Ministry of Home Affairs to request information related to Mahua Moitra’s foreign travel details in the last five years. The committee will investigate where Mahua went abroad and whether she provided information to the Lok Sabha. Subsequently, her log-in will be matched with her MP ID. Moitra had been summoned by the committee to appear for questioning on October 31.

Mahua had written to the committee, stating that she would not be present on October 31.

This information outlines the steps taken by the Ethics Committee regarding Mahua Moitra’s foreign travel details and the date of her scheduled questioning.

On October 27, Mahua Moitra wrote a letter to the Ethics Committee, stating that she would not be able to attend on October 31, but there is an error in her letter. In the letter, she mistakenly mentioned her name as “Dubai” instead of her real name. This error was picked up by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey when he mentioned it on social media. Nishikant wrote that the accused MP is consuming so much in Dubai that she even referred to her name as “Dubai” in the letter to the Ethics Committee, instead of her actual name. Moitra later corrected her name to describe her mental state. Oh my luck?

This information highlights the humorous aspect of a mistake made by Mahua Moitra in her letter to the Ethics Committee and the subsequent correction.

Mahua Moitra, on October 27, sent a letter to the Ethics Committee in which she requested that the serious allegations be taken into consideration and the principles of justice be upheld. She appealed to the panel to ask Hiranandani to be present and provide her deposition. She also expressed her concern that any investigation against Hiranandani could be incomplete without a proper record of her oral testimony. Therefore, it is essential for Hiranandani to appear before the panel.

However, Nishikant Dubey, a TMC MP, explained that he would be engaged in festivities and programs from October 30 to November 4, right after Vijayadashami. Hence, he wouldn’t be able to attend in Delhi on October 31.

Nishikant Dubey wrote a letter to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on October 15, alleging that Mahua Moitra accepted money and gifts from businessman Darshan Hiranandani to ask questions in Parliament. The Speaker had referred this matter to the Ethics Committee.

Nishikant Dubey, on October 21, levied more serious allegations against Mahua Moitra. He accused her of accepting money for compromising the country’s security. He stated that he had filed a complaint with the Lokpal regarding these allegations.

Regarding the issue of India’s ID being opened from Dubai, it’s related to the National Informatics Centre (NIC), which is responsible for the overall technical infrastructure of the Indian government. This includes the Prime Minister’s Office, Ministries, and various central agencies. Whether the TMC and opposition parties are involved in politics is a decision for the public to make. The NIC has provided this information to the agency.

These events describe the ongoing allegations and investigations involving Mahua Moitra, Darshan Hiranandani, and the political response from different parties. The involvement of NIC in these matters is a technical aspect related to India’s digital infrastructure.

Sure, here’s an overview of the four key figures related to the case:

  1. Mahua Moitra: She has a background in banking and has worked in London and engaged in politics in West Bengal. Mahua Moitra is the central character in this case, facing various allegations. She is a Member of Parliament from the Trinamool Congress (TMC). She first entered politics in West Bengal in 2016, winning the election for Karimpur Vidhan Sabha. In 2019, she contested for a Lok Sabha seat from Krishnanagar and won.
  2. Nishikant Dubey: He is a Member of Parliament from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Before entering politics in 2009, Nishikant Dubey had a corporate career. He was previously the corporate head of the Essar Group. He won his first election from Godda, Jharkhand. Later, he won the 2014 and 2019 Lok Sabha elections.
  3. Darshan Hiranandani: He is the CEO of the Hiranandani Group, a prominent real estate and infrastructure company in Mumbai. Darshan Hiranandani has been accused of various wrongdoings, and allegations have been levied against Mahua Moitra involving him. His father, Niranjan Hiranandani, is a prominent real estate industrialist.
  4. Jay Anant Dehadrai: He is a Supreme Court lawyer. He had a prior association with Mahua Moitra, being friends initially. However, they had a falling out later. Moitra filed a police complaint against Dehadrai in the past, accusing him of theft, explicit messages, and harassment. Dehadrai, in turn, filed a counter-complaint in CBI, alleging various wrongdoings by Moitra. These allegations have now become part of the case, with Nishikant Dubey raising allegations against Moitra in the Parliament based on Dehadrai’s claims.

These are the four key figures in this case, with each playing a distinct role in the unfolding events and allegations.

Mahua Moitra, a Member of Parliament, has raised 62 questions in Parliament related to various ministries, including petroleum, agriculture, shipping, civil aviation, and coal. These questions are part of her parliamentary duties, and raising questions is a common practice for Members of Parliament.

The Ethics Committee of Parliament will investigate whether these questions were asked in the interest of the public or if they were intended to benefit her own business. If the allegations of impropriety are proven true, she could face disciplinary action based on the committee’s recommendations.

It’s important to note that raising questions in Parliament is a regular legislative process, but ethical standards require that these questions are raised in the public interest and not for personal gain. The Ethics Committee will conduct a thorough investigation to determine the validity of these allegations. Depending on the findings of the investigation, actions may be taken, including disciplinary measures if any wrongdoing is established.

In summary, the Ethics Committee will review these allegations, and if any wrongdoing is established, appropriate actions will be taken.

Niyati Rao

Niyati Rao is a seasoned writer and avid consumer who specializes in crafting informative and engaging articles and product reviews. With a passion for research and a knack for finding the best deals, Niyati enjoys helping readers make informed decisions about their purchases.